Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 559 F. Supp. 107 - Smith v. Smith

559 F. Supp. 107 - Smith v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 1999
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Carlsberg Resources Corp. v. Cambria Savings & Loan Ass'n · Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon v. Lewis S. Rosenstiel · Solomon v. Solomon · Firestone III v. Cleveland Trust Company a · Pettinelli v. Danzig

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the district court has an independent obligation to determine in every instance whether its jurisdiction is proper”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.