Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 559 FSUPP 75 - King v. Edwards

King v. Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1999
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1461 (Examination Parity and Year 2000 Readiness for Financial Institutions Act) · 12 U.S.C. § 1464 (Consumer Home Mortgage Assistance Act of 1974) · 12 U.S.C. § 1701 (Affordable Housing for Seniors and Families Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 787 · 15 U.S.C. § 78Q (§ 17 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 80B · 15 U.S.C. § 80B · 15 U.S.C. § 80B

Relies on Cort v. Ash · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington · Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co. · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No solicitation of a proxy shall be made by means of any statement, form of proxy, notice of meeting, or other communication, written or oral, which ... (c)(1) Contains any statement that is false or misleading with respect to any material fact, or (2) Omits to state any material fact: (i) Necessary in order to make the statements therein not false or misleading or (ii) Necessary to correct any statement in any earlier communication with respect to the solicitation of a proxy for the same meeting or subject matter that has subsequently become false or misleading.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'issue substantially similar regulations to regulations and rules issued by the [Securities and Exchange Commission] ...' for purposes of enforcing certain provisions of the [Securities Exchange Act of 1934], including the proxy solicitation provisions, against institutions insured by the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation.... 15 U.S.C. Sec. 781(i).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “logical to assume that Congress intended a private right of action to exist under FHLBB rules”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.