Dawson v. Esparza’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
August 2004
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Zachodni · Svedberg v. Stamness · In Interest of ADL · Dawson v. Guerrero · In Interest of MDN
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). There can simultaneously be reasonable grounds, or probable cause, to believe something both is and is not the case. See T.M. at 443 (probable cause is met when”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. In Interest of AE“than reasonable grounds in context of disorderly conduct); State v. Zachodni, 466 N.W.2d 624, 629 (S.D.1991) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. In Interest of AE“); Svedberg v. Stamness, 525 N.W.2d 678 , 681 n. 2 (N.D.1994) (preponderance of the evidence is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. In Interest of AE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.