Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 559 P.2d 459 - Leppke v. State

Leppke v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1982
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Samples v. State · 96 Okla. Crim. 198 - Paschall v. State · Brown v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If defendant’s counsel is surprised at such action and such endorsement of an additional witness requires a production of further testimony by defendant, he should withdraw his announcement of ready for trial and should file a motion for a postponement or a continuance in which he should set out the facts constituting such surprise, and the other evidence, if any, he could produce to rebut the testimony of such additional witness if the trial of the case was continued. Where he fails to do this the error, if any, is waived.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.