Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 559 P2D 80 - Silides v. Thomas

Silides v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 2023

15 state decisions

70197719801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Snowden v. Hughes · Eaton v. Hobson · Sun Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission · Anti-Defamation League Of B'nai B'rith v. Fcc · Blades v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the lack of clarity inherent in AS 39.50.-020 and the impossibility of compliance with AS 39.50.020 [requiring the statement to be filed with the APOC at the time the declaration of candidacy was filed with the lieutenant governor or an election supervisor] for a would-be candidate living [away from APOC offices] who files his declaration of candidacy near the June deadline.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[elach candidate shall file the name and address of the campaign treasurer with the [Alaska Public Offices] [Clommis sion no later than seven days after the date of filing his declaration of candidacy or his nominating petition.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Although it would have been preferable to have promulgated regulations, we do not think any regulations were necessary to implement the mandatory filing provisions established by AS 15.13.060(c).” (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.