Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 559 So. 2d 201 - Porter v. Dugger

559 So. 2d 201 - Porter v. Dugger’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
September 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lockett v. Ohio · Eddings v. Oklahoma · Penry v. Lynaugh · Gardner v. Florida · Maynard v. Cartwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an allegation of ineffective counsel will not be permitted to serve as a means of circumventing the rule that habeas corpus proceedings do not provide a second or substitute appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e have long recognized that the failure to consider nonstatutory mitigating circumstances by a judge or jury is grounds for reversal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]t is only in the case of error that prejudicially denies fundamental constitutional rights that this Court will revisit a matter previously settled by the affirmance of a conviction or sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.