559 So. 2d 587 - Fumigation Dept. v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 472 So. 2d 1145 - Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe · 395 So. 2d 203 - FLA. ERECTION SERV. INC. v. McDonald · 523 So. 2d 1190 - Martin Marietta Corp. v. Glumb · 401 So. 2d 1388 - Sam Rogers Enterprises v. Williams · 505 So. 2d 497 - What an Idea, Inc. v. Sitko
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the statutory fee schedule embodies a legislative intent to standardize the method for assessing fees[,] departures from its percentage formula should be made only in exceptional circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he deputy is vested with considerable discretion in his analysis of the statutory criteria and his conclusion as to what constitutes a reasonable fee,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“may increase or decrease the attorney's fee if, in his judgment, the circumstances of the particular case warrant such action... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.