559 So. 2d 601 - State v. McAdams’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2013
1 federal appellate · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stone v. Powell · 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Public Broadcasting Service v. Network Project · Ohio v. Gallagher · United States ex rel. Hines v. LaVallee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally, recorded conversations of defendants in the back seat of a police car do not violate defendant's statutory or constitutional rights because there can be no expectation of privacy in a police car.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In any event, an address is the type of information that would be readily available through independent sources or would inevitably be discovered once the recorded conversation was reviewed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. JM v. State“[w]hile it is true that after the recorded conversation the address took on added significance, this does not mean that booking information otherwise appropriate should now be suppressed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. JM v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.