559 So. 2d 731 - Kell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
September 2011
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · 551 So. 2d 1237 - State v. Pye · 520 So. 2d 696 - State v. Hoover · Ruddack v. State · 521 So. 2d 334 - King v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consisted only of walking down the street in a 'high prostitution area' at 9:30 in the evening”); Kell v. State, 559 So.2d 731, 731 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1990) (”[T]he mere fact that the appellant was present in a high crime area, which happened to be where he lived, at nighttime, without more, such as suspicious conduct or unusual circumstances ... does not warrant an investigatory stop.”); McCloud v. State, 491 So.2d 1164, 1167 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1986) (no reasonable suspicion to support a stop based”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.