Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 559 SW3D 5 - Bosworth v. State

Bosworth v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gehrke v. State · State of Missouri v. Amanda N. Bazell · State v. Larson · State v. Smith · State ex rel. Windeknecht v. Mesmer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may be procedurally cognizable under Rule 24.035 in a strictly technical sense, [it] is substantively without merit as a matter of law”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “authorized by a different interpretation of [S]ection 570.030 without objection [such that the parties] should not receive the benefit of retroactive application of [the Supreme] Court's decision in Bazell .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “appropriat[ing] property or services of another with the purpose to deprive him or her thereof, either without his or her consent or by means of deceit or coercion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.