Bradshaw v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bowers v. Smith · Missourians to Protect the Initiative Process v. Blunt · Doe v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of St. Louis · Gail & Darrell Mansfield v. Caleb Horner & John Horner · State Ex Rel. Womack v. Rolf
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. If a referendum petition sample sheet is approved, the secretary of state must make the sample petition available on the secretary of state's website to provide a fifteen day public comment period. Section 116.334.1. And, within twenty-three days of approval of the sample sheet, the secretary of state is required to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Section 116.050 addresses other requirements for the form of [referendum] petitions, including page size, the requirement that each page of the [referendum] petition attach or contain a full and correct text of the proposed measure, and the format and content of the full and correct text of the proposed measure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“chapter 116 bifurcates the secretary of state's authority with respect to the initiative [and referendum] process into two stages: the pre-signature collection stage and the post-signature collection stage”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.