Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 559 U.S. 196 - Bloate v. United States

Bloate v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

341
cited by 341 later decisions
15
cited 15 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

136 federal appellate · 34 district · 6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedUnited States v. Bloate (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 3162 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co. · George Duncan Superintendent Great Meadow Correctional Facility v. Sherman Walker · Henderson v. United States · Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 341 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “delay resulting from any pretrial motion, from the filing of the motion through the conclusion of the hearing on, or other prompt disposition of, such motion”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(h) The following periods of delay shall be excluded in computing the time within which an information or indictment must be filed, or in computing the time in which the trial of any such offense must commence: (6) A reasonable period of delay when the defendant is joined for trial with a codefendant as to whom the time for trial has not run and no motion for severance has been granted.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “set[ ] forth, in the record of the case, either orally or in writing, its reasons for finding that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.