Rosenberg v. Howle’s Empirical Analysis
1948
Citation profile
2 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 2008
2 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lehigh Zinc & Iron Co. v. Bamford · Grand Trunk Western R. v. H. W. Nelson Co. · Public Motor Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey · Baker v. Baker · New York Title & Mortgage Co. v. Hutton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Generally actionable fraud is the concealment of a fact which should have been disclosed, or is the representation of the existence of a material fact which did not exist. That representation must be positively made knowing it to be false, or recklessly and positively made without knowledge of its truth. The party to whom the representation is made must not only be warranted in accepting it, but he must actually accept it, and, relying on its truth, act as contemplated by the party making it. [Footnote omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Feltman v. Sarbov
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.