56 Ala. App. 166 - Frazier v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 1993
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daniels v. State · 48 Ala. App. 726 - Eady v. State · Baldwin v. State · 31 Ala. App. 571 - Mullins v. State · Wilson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Where witnesses testified as to the good reputation of the defendant, it was permissible on cross-examination to test their knowledge of the defendant's reputation by asking if they had heard of specific acts of the defendant that tended *Page 905 to mitigate against his reputation or character . . . Baldwin v. State , 282 Ala. 653 , 213 So.2d 819 ."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"The grand jury of said county charge that, before the finding of this indictment, JOSEPHUS R. ANDERSON, alias ROBERT HENDERSON, JR., whose name is to the Grand Jury otherwise unknown, feloniously took Thirteen Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Dollars in American Express Travelers checks and Two Thousand Three Hundred Eight Dollars of the lawful currency of the United States of America, a more particular description and denomination of which is to the Grand Jury otherwise *Page 1371 unknown, the personal property of Jill Tapscott, from her person and against her will, by violence to her person or by putting her in such fear as unwillingly to part with the same."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.