Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 Ala. App. 552 - Starks v. State

56 Ala. App. 552 - Starks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1985
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 47 Ala. App. 65 - Ireland v. State · Twyman v. State · 53 Ala. App. 36 - Cooper v. State · Twyman v. State · Marriage of Nardone v. Nardone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The trial judge, the defendant, and defendant’s attorney all attest over their respective signatures that the matters and things stated in ‘Court’s Exhibit A’ were read by defendant or read to defendant. Defendant acknowledges that this was done and that he understands those matters and things. . . There is no rule of law that requires or even suggests that it must be presumed that the trial judge, the defendant, defendant’s attorney, or the judgment entry do not speak the truth. The judgment is not contradicted by the instant record . . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.