Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 Ala. App. 609 - Smith v. State

56 Ala. App. 609 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 1984
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McKee v. State · 21 Ala. App. 234 - Jones v. State · 25 Ala. App. 179 - Curlette v. State · 48 Ala. App. 743 - Ayers v. State · 32 Ala. App. 591 - Wilson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`[T]he unlawful killing of another human being, without malice and without intent to kill or to inflict the injury resulting *Page 538 in death, but accidentally committed by the accused while he was doing an unlawful act amounting to a misdemeanor, or accidentally committed by the accused while he was doing a lawful act, but in a grossly negligent or improper manner.'"”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"The taking of one or more drinks of intoxicating liquor would not of itself be sufficient to establish the fact of intoxication. The evidence must go further and show facts indicating a mental condition not normal and produced or brought about by the intoxicating liquor. When, therefore, an accident occurs on a public road in which a person is killed by being run over by an automobile, and it is shown that the driver has been drinking, it becomes a question for the jury to say, from all the facts and circumstances surrounding the homicide, whether or not the driver at the time of the accident was under the influence of liquor, and, if so, was that condition the proximate cause of the homicide. If these facts be proven to the satisfaction of the jury beyond a reasonable doubt, the crime of manslaughter in the second degree would be complete."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.