Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 ARK 476 - Riggin v. Hillard

Riggin v. Hillard’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
8
states following
September 1976
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently September 1976 · most notably Townsend v. Cleveland Fire Proofing Co. (1897), Horstmann v. LaFargue (1919)

30 state decisions

80189219001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Bourbon County · Pendleton v. Perkins · Rodman v. Sanders · Boone County v. Keck · Roeller v. Ames

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘ ‘ Section 6297. In suits to set aside fraudulent conveyances and to obtain equitable garnishments, it shall not be necessary for the plaintiff to obtain judgment at law in order to prove insolvency, but in such cases insolvency may be proved by any competent testimony, so that only one suit shall be necessary in order to obtain the proper relief.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““But the remedies of equity are not fixed and unbending, like the legal process of garnishment; and if the court can ascertain that no inconvenience can result to the public by its interference with the corporation’s right to pay the debt directly to its debtor, there is nothing to prevent the court from doing so.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.