Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 ARK 563 - Bond v. Montgomery

Bond v. Montgomery’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
11
states following
October 1947
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently October 1947 · most notably Wilkins, Neely & Jones v. Gibson (1901), Sneed v. State (1923)

2 federal appellate · 39 state decisions — followed in 11 states

130189219001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Parkersburg v. Brown · Curtis and Others v. . Leavitt · Thomas v. City of Richmond · Tracy v. . Talmage · Vallé's Heirs v. Fleming's Heirs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Until the children reach the age of 21 years it cannot he sold to pay the debts of the estate of the deceased owner, nor be partitioned among the heirs. The land constituting it cannot be sold to pay such debts, subject to the homestead rights of the children, during fheir minority. The Constitution sets it apart as a home and sanctuary for the widow and children, and for the purpose of preventing any other person invading it under a claim of right, or interfering with them in the undisturbed enjoyment of the shelter, comfort, and security of it as a home, guards and protects it against sales and transfers. The same reason which makes it unlawful to sell the land constituting it for the payment of the debts of the deceased owner, subject to the homestead rights of the children, during their minority, makes it unlawful to vest it in the widow, subject to the same rights of the children, during their minority. One endangers the quiet, security, and comfort of a home provided in the homestead as much as the other, and both equally violate the spirit and manifest intent of the Constitution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.