Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 ARKAPP 171 - Howard v. Cramlet

Howard v. Cramlet’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2019

15 state decisions

70199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fulcher v. Dierks Lumber & Coal Co. · Wilson v. Brown · Massee v. Schiller · Drainage Dist. No. 16, Miss. Cty. v. Holly Roach · Bradley v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “essential to the validity of the grant of an easement that it be described by metes and bounds or by figures giving definite dimensions of the easement.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.