Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 CAL2D 288 - People v. Monk

People v. Monk’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

174
cited by 174 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
November 2000
most recently cited

171 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 174 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2000 · most notably Faretta v. California (1975), 2 Cal. 3d 118 - People v. Marsden (1970)

171 state decisions

106019611970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 50 Cal. 2d 383 - People v. Wein · People v. Chessman · People v. Odle · People v. Green · People v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 174 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Moreover, even if there had been any incompetency on the part of defense counsel, it is questionable whether defendant in the instant case could complain on appeal. A defendant may complain at any time during the trial that his counsel is not adequately representing him thereby affording the trial court an opportunity to correct the situation, but if a defendant fails to avail himself of this privilege at the trial level, he cannot ordinarily after an adverse judgment first complain of the matter on appeal. (People v. Prado, 190 Cal.App.2d 374, 377 [ 12 Cal.Rptr. 141 ]; People v. Comstock, 147 Cal.App.2d 287, 299 [ 305 P.2d 288 ]; People v. Hood, 141 Cal.App.2d 585, 589-590 [ 297 P.2d 52 ].)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is the fact, not the distance, of forcible removal which constitutes kidnaping in this state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.