People v. Robin’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2011
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Lim · Kreling v. Superior Court · 54 Cal. App. 2d 120 - Pezold v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen · 82 Cal. App. 564 - Willson v. Edwards
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is very evident that if following the despicable calling of usurer constitutes a public nuisance [as defined in Civil Code section 3479] it must be because such conduct constitutes `an obstruction to the free use of property'.... It could not by any stretch of the imagination be considered as covered by any other clause of the code definition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the unlawful sale of liquor, of itself, ... does not constitute a nuisance within the terms of section 3479, Civil Code....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.