Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 CONNAPP 561 - State v. Mitchell

State v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2021

19 state decisions

110200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Rakas v. Illinois · Jones v. United States · United States v. Salvucci · Steagald v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the same test as that under the United States constitution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The United States Supreme Court in United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83 , 100 S.Ct. 2547 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980), overruled Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960), thereby eliminating the rule that defendants had automatic standing to challenge the legality of a search that produced evidence against them. . . . Salvucci held that a defendant must first establish a reasonable expectation of privacy in the premises before he may assert that his fourth amendment rights have been violated by improper intrusion into those premises.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The application of the fourth amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures requires the defendant to establish that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the invaded area. . . . Absent such an expectation, the subsequent police action has no constitutional ramifications.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.