Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 CONNAPP 722 - State v. Charles

State v. Charles’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

24 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Golding · Phillips v. Washington Legal Foundation · Institut Pasteur v. Cambridge Biotech Corp. · State v. Day · State v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Absent the evidentiary hearing available in the collateral action, review in this court of the ineffective assistance claim is at best difficult and sometimes impossible. The evidentiary hearing provides the trial court with the evidence that is often necessary to evaluate the competency of the defense and the harmfulness of any incompetency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.