Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 F.1d 271 - Hodson v. The Harry Lynn

Hodson v. The Harry Lynn’s Empirical Analysis

56 F. 271 · 1893

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
September 1983
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1983

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

201893190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no exception to the rule requiring a lookout in favor of craft capable of committing injuries, on account of size.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.