Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 F.1d 304 - Electro-Dynamic Co. v. The Electron

Electro-Dynamic Co. v. The Electron’s Empirical Analysis

56 F. 304 · 1893

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
January 1939
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1939

3 federal appellate ·

1018931900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on De Witt v. Berry · City of Chester v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 1 · Consumers' Gas Co. of Danville v. American Electric Construction Co. · American Electric Const. Co. v. Consumers' Gas Co. · Carman v. Trude

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““I have just seen Mr. Bates, who confirms the rough estimate I made to you the other day in answer to your request for a price on refitting the Electron with two hundred and fifty (250) cells of storage battery, and with the original motor rewound so as to produce 15 horse power, or 25 horse power as a spurt, or to produce readily about 10 horse power at ordinary service. We therefore propose to furnish you with two hundred and fifty (250) new cells of ‘22 M’ accumulators, rewind one motor, supply two (2) new armatures, supply all necessary switches and wiring and ten (10) incandescent lamps and sockets for the sum of four thousand and ten dollars ($4,010), payable two thousand dollars ($2,000) cash on delivery of the material at Newark, N. X, ready to go on the boat, and one thousand dollars ($1,000) in a sixty-days note, and one thousand and ten dollars ($1,010) in a 90-days note, interest added, drawn to your order, and indorsed by you.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.