Bent v. Commissioner

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 8, 1932.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1932-02-08

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1970

4 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

2 counsel of record

Relies on Bent v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Curtis Dwight Wilbur · Decided 1932-02-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Julius V. Patrosso, of Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.

¶2G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John G. Remey, John H. McEvers, and Wm. Earl Smith, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, and James K. Polk, Jr., Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondent.

¶3Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and JAMES, District Judge.

¶4WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

¶5In pursuance of stipulation, the judgment in this case shall follow the judgment in case No. 6449, H. Stanley Bent v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C. C. A.) 56 F.(2d) 99.

¶6Order affirmed.