Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 F.2d 344 - Aufdenkamp v. L'Herrison

Aufdenkamp v. L'Herrison’s Empirical Analysis

56 F.2d 344 · 1932

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
February 1952
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Windsor v. McVeigh · Kennedy v. Gibson · Hale v. Allinson · Casey v. Galli · United States of America v. Bitter Root Development Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not necessary to cite many authorities for the proposition that where the main cause of action is of a legal nature, equity has no jurisdiction, provided the complainant has full and adequate remedy at law for the wrongs complained of. ^ * sfc “Those persons who were guilty of the wrong must be made parties in either court, in order to bind them. Such alleged multiplicity is not avoided in one court more than in the other.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.