Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

56 F.2d 829

Docket No. 284.

In re Weinstock

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1932.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1932-03-07

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1962

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Kirsner v. Taliaferro · United States ex rel. Paleais v. Moore · In re Torgovnick

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-03-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James H. Levinson, of New York City, for appellant.

¶2Samuel Sturtz, of New York City, for appellee.

¶3Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

¶4PEE CURIAM.

¶5This is an appeal without leave from an order upon a petition of a trustee in bankruptcy against the bankrupt, summarily directing him to turn over a sum of money received by him, and alleged to be part of the bankrupt estate. As such it is a bankruptcy proceeding under section 24b, Bankr. Act (11 USCA § 47 (b), and not a controversy in bankruptcy under section 24a of the act (11 USCA § 47 (a). In re Shidlovsky, 224 F. 450 (C. C. A. 2); U. S. v. Moore, 294 F. 852, 855 (C. C. A. 2) (semble); Kirsner v. Taliaferro, 202 F. 51, (C. C. A. 4). There is no jurisdiction without leave to appeal granted within thirty days. In re The Torgovnick, 49 F.(2d) 211 (C. C. A. 2).

¶6The appeal is dismissed.

/56/f2d/829 · .json · Public domain