Ingram v. Mandler’s Empirical Analysis
56 F.2d 994 · 1932
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 1991
10 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Markham v. . Jaudon · Skiff v. Stoddard · Harris v. City of Philadelphia · Swanson v. Spencer · 35 Cal. App. 325 - Dunn v. Barry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The word payable, when used in connection with commercial transactions, means that which is to be paid rather than that which may be paid.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.