Fallini v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
56 F.3d 1378 · 1995
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 119 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably 25 Cal. 4th 809 - Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La Habra (2001), Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. United States (2005)
22 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1491 · 28 U.S.C. § 2501
Relies on Vandygriff v. Phillips · Delaware State College v. Ricks · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · Nollan v. California Coastal Commission · United States v. Dickinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 119 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[following Dow, the Court of Claims adopted a similarly narrow interpretation of Dickinson and the meaning of “stabilization” in the takings context. In Kabua v. United States, 546 F.2d 381 , 384, 212 Ct.Cl. 160 (1976), the court noted that in Dow, the Supreme Court “more or less limited [Dickinson ] to the class of flooding cases to which it belonged, when the landowner must wait in asserting his claim, until he knows whether the subjection to flooding is so substantial and frequent as to constitute a taking.””
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e do not think the Supreme Court, in the Dickinson case, meant to hold that plaintiff was entitled to wait until any possibility of further damage has been removed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t is not necessary that damages from the alleged taking be complete and fully calculable before the cause of action accrues.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.