56 F. 3d 1531 - Stebbins v. Signet Banking Corporation Na

56 F3d 1531 Stebbins v. Signet Banking Corporation Na

56 F.3d 1531

312 U.S.App.D.C. 461

Emmett J. STEBBINS, Appellant,
v.
SIGNET BANKING CORPORATION, trading as Signet Bank NA.

No. 94-7106.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

June 13, 1995.

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before: WALD, BUCKLEY, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b). It is

2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's orders filed April 13, and April 26, 1994, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.