56 F3d 1531 United States v. Acuna

56 F.3d 1531

312 U.S.App.D.C. 461

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Cesar ACUNA, a/k/a Areundro Gaitan, Appellant.

No. 94-3081.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 24, 1995.

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Advertisement
view counter
1

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. After full review of the case, the court is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the appeal does not warrant an opinion. See D.C.Cir.R. 36(b).

2

For substantially the reasons set forth in the district court's order filed May 20, 1994, it is

3

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the court that the district court's order be affirmed.

4

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41.