Solimine v. Ortho McNeil

First Circuit Court of Appeals

May 30, 1995.

This page is marked noindex.

First Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-05-30

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-05-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2012

12 federal appellate · 6 district ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.

Anthony Solimine on brief pro se.

D.Mass.

AFFIRMED.

Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, SELYA and BOUDIN Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

We have reviewed appellant's brief and the record on appeal. We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum, dated April 26, 1994.

¶2

Appellant's "motion for leave to file up to ten (10) page memorandum on supplemental authorities and an appendix" and "motion for leave to file brief memorandum of supplemental authorities" are denied. They are extremely tardy and, in any event, present nothing of merit.

¶3

Appellant's motion for oral argument is denied.

¶4

The district court's order of dismissal is affirmed.