56 F3d 61 Hively v. A Lanham

Randolph E. HIVELY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Richard A. LANHAM; Ronald Moats; Michael Shirk, Captain;
Terry Tucker; John Alderton; Jennifer Schell;
Gary Blickenstat; Herbert Nusbaum;
Fred Nastri; Karen A. Elliott,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-6376.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 31, 1995.

56 F.3d 61
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Randolph E. Hively, appellant pro se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Advertisement
view counter
1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hively v. Lanham, No. CA-94-2075-AW (D. Md. Mar. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED