Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

56 F.3d 61

Docket No. 95-6214.

Lewis v. Tw Bell

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: April 20, 1995 Decided: May 25, 1995

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-05-25

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Owens v. Lw Huffman Yl

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-05-25

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Dalton L. Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. James Peeler Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and its order dismissing one defendant for lack of service under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(j), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders on the reasoning of the district court. Lewis v. Bell, No. CA-93-513-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. May 20 and Dec. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/56/f3d/61 · .json · Public domain