Glover v. Hargett’s Empirical Analysis
56 F.3d 682 · 1995
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Coleman v. Thompson · Teague v. Lane · Murray v. Carrier · Brewster v. Derwinski · Yohey v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] contention not raised by a habeas petitioner in the district court cannot be considered for the first time on appeal from that court's denial of habeas relief.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[B]ecause Teague concerned the retroactive application of court-made rules of criminal procedure, not state statutes”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lagundoye
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.