Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

56 F.3d 69

Docket No. 94-2299EM.

William A. Youngerman v. United States

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 12, 1995. Filed: May 17, 1995.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-05-12

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently April 2006 · most notably Ikenokwalu-White v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2003), Tenge v. Phillips Modern Ag Co. (2006)

40 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Rogers v. United States · Boyer v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-05-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Before FAGG, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

William A. Youngerman appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. Although many of Youngerman's claims are procedurally barred from review because he failed to raise them on direct appeal, see Boyer v. United States, 988 F.2d 56, 57 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam), the district court considered each of Youngerman's claims on the merits. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court correctly denied Youngerman's claims. See Rogers v. United States, 1 F.3d 697, 699 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam).

¶2

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

/56/f3d/69 · .json · Public domain