United States v. Adames’s Empirical Analysis
56 F.3d 737 · 1995
Citation profile
51 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably United States v. Wilson (1998), United States v. Koerth (2002)
51 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Leon · Kotteakos v. United States · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Pelaes v. United States · Yagow v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Balancing probative value against prejudicial effect is a highly discretionary function which is afforded great deference by this Court.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to prevent inadmissible evidence from being suggested to the jury by any means, such as ... asking questions in the hearing of the jury.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Removing the jury from the courtroom is one way to effectuate the commands of Rule 103(c).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.