¶1 Herman E. Harston appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Dunlap v. Litscher, 301 F.3d 873, 876 (7th Cir.2002); Rodriguez v. Mitchell, 252 F.3d 191, 203 n. 3 (2d Cir.2001); Fierro v. Johnson, 197 F.3d 147, 150 (5th Cir.1999). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Harston v. Huffman, No. CA-95-1294-R (W.D.Va. Sept. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma *129 terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.