Helms v. Conroy

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 14, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-02-14

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2003

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-02-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Jerry Adam Helms seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) and denying his motions for a new trial and to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Helms has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Helms v. Conroy, No. CA-02-68-PJM (D. Md. June 20 and July 24, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.