Butler v. Gunja

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 26, 2003

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-02-26

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-02-26

PER CURIAM.

¶1 James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Bivens * claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Butler v. Gunja, No. CA-01-3770-WMN (D. Md. June 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

¶3 Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).