Jackson v. Go-Tane Services, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956) · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 29 U.S.C. § 255 · 29 U.S.C. § 260
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Corning Glass Works v. Brennan · Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc. · Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & Associates · Bankston v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We agree with the reasoning in [Daylight Dairy Products ], that, where the supervised employees work “full time” only 67% of the-time over the relevant time period, such amount of supervision falls short of the “regular and customary” supervision of two full-time employ ees that is required under Section 241.1(f).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“liquidated damages are mandatory, unless the trial court determines that the employer, while acting in good faith, reasonably believed that its conduct was consistent with the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.