Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 FLA 708 - Vaughan's Seed Store v. Stringfellow

Vaughan's Seed Store v. Stringfellow’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
7
states following
December 1978
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently December 1978

1 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

6019081910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on White v. . Miller · Passinger v. . Thorburn · Parker v. Bond · McCallum v. Driggs · Talladega Insurance v. Peacock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The defendant’s engagement was that the seed sold was the Arlington White Spine cucumber seed and Would produce Arlington Whtie Spine cucumbers. The natural consequence of a breach of such a warranty would be a crop of cucumbers different in kind and quality from that guar anteed by the defendant. Where, then, the seed produces a crop not harmful to the land, but of a poorer character, or of an inferior quality, and less value then would have been produced had the warranty been fulfilled, the measure of damage is the value of the crop of the true product, such as the seed was warranted to produce, and such as would ordinarily have been produced that year, less the expense of raising it, and less also the value of the crop actually raised from the seed sold; or, in other words, the measure of damage would be the difference between the market value of the crop raised and the crop from the seed ordered. 30 Am. & Eng. Ency. Law (2d Ed.) 219; Wolcott v. Mount, 36 N. J. Law, 262, 13 Am. Rep. 438 ; White v. Miller, 71 N. Y. 118 , 27 Am. Rep. 13 ; Passinger v. Thorburn, 34 N. Y. 634 , 90 Am. Dec. 753 ; Depew v. Peck Hardware Co., 121 App. Div. 28 , 105 N. Y. Supp. 390 .” 48 South. Rep. text 414.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.