In re KMF Actions’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2009
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 26 (§ 16 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 78N (§ 14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 80A · 15 U.S.C. § 80A · 15 U.S.C. § 80B
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. · Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. · J. I. Case Co. v. Borak
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“have dominated and controlled their respective investment advisers and their personnel, policies and boards of directors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“have dominated and controlled their respective . . . funds and their personnel, policies and boards of directors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“have not been either the subject or the result of arm's length bargaining”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.