Arakawa v. Japan Network Group’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2016
4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000A (Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. · Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co. · Cole v. Burns International Security Services · Paladino v. Avnet Computer Technologies, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the possibility that a plaintiff may be required to pay arbitration fees is not, by itself, a sufficient reason to invalidate an agreement to arbitrate ... because the arbitral panel may not in fact require the plaintiff to pay fees and, if a plaintiff believes that excessive fees have been levied against him or her, judicial review of the imposition of the fees is available after arbitration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“At this point in the litigation it is not clear how large the fees of the arbitration will be or whether plaintiff will be required to pay any portion of it....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“arbitration is often far more affordable to plaintiffs and defendants alike than is pursuing a claim in court”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.