Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 Haw. 664 - State v. Laurie

State v. Laurie’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
3
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably State v. O'DANIEL (1980), State v. Naeole (1980)

39 state decisions

190197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Perez v. United States · Benchwick v. United States · State v. Rocker · State v. Cummings · State v. Cannon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial judge, in passing.upon a motion for directed verdict of acquittal, must determine whether upon the evidence, giving full play to the right of the jury to determine credibility, weigh the evidence and draw justifiable inferences of fact, a reasonable mind might fairly conclude guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It matters not if a conviction under the evidence as so considered might be deemed to be against the weight of the evidence so long as there is substantial evidence tending to support the requisite findings for conviction. [Citations omitted.] The test on appeal is not whether guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt, but whether there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the trier of fact. Further, the rule is the same whether the accused has been tried before a judge or a jury. [Citations omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “If the jury, after retiring for deliberation, desires to be informed on any point of law . . . [t]he court shall give appropriate additional instructions in response to the jury's request unless. . . the jury may be adequately informed by directing their attention to some portion of the original instructions [.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.