State v. Tsukiyama’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably State v. Quino (1992), State v. Kearns (1994)
40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Adams v. Williams · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · People v. Simon · Skibs v. Otis McAlLister & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n order to determine if the defendant's liberty was restrained and he was, therefore, seized, we must evaluate the totality of the circumstances and decide whether or not a reasonably prudent person would believe he was free to go.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tominiko · State v. Quino“the police officer must be able to point to specific and articulable facts which, taken together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tominiko · State v. Dawson“Only when the officer, by means of physical force or show of authority[,] has in some way restrained the liberty of a citizen may we conclude that a `seizure' has occurred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.