56 Ill. 2d 175 - People v. Hickman’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
November 1984
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Barker v. Wingo · Jackson v. Denno · United States v. Ewell · 53 Ill. 2d 62 - People v. Prim
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While we have determined that defendant’s guilt was properly established, we find that the judgment entered for attempted armed robbery must be reversed. In People v. Prim, 53 Ill.2d 62, 78 , we held that a multiple concurrent sentence for attempted armed robbery could not be imposed in conjunction with a sentence for murder. We find that under the factual situation herein the rationale of Prim is applicable.” ( 56 Ill.2d 175, 186 , 306 N.E.2d 32, 38 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.