Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 56 Ill. 2d 201 - People v. Turner

56 Ill. 2d 201 - People v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

97 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently March 2015 · most notably 72 Ill. 2d 421 - People v. Murphy (1978), 136 Ill. 2d 27 - People v. Reid (1990)

97 state decisions

37019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Johnson v. Zerbst · Schmerber v. State of California · 39 Ill. 2d 489 - The PEOPLE v. Hester

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The purpose of advising an accused of his rights is to enable him to make an intelligent decision, and to understand the consequences of that decision, and the fact that the advice was iterated and reiterated, and that he said he understood it, is of little consequence unless the defendant was possessed of the intelligence to understand the admonition. Although there is no doubt that defendant was advised of his rights as mandated by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , the question presented by this record is whether he knowingly waived those rights.” (People v. Turner (1973), 56 Ill. 2d 201, 205 .)”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.