56 Ind. 206
Decided May 15, 1877
Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1877-05-15
<p>Liqjjob Law.—Evidence.— Venue.—Where the evidence on the trial of a prosecution for an unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor does not show where such sale was made, a .conviction of the defendant is erroneous.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1910
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1877-05-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Indictment for retailing without license. Conviction.
¶2The same questions are made in this case as in Long v. The State, ante, p. 133; but the judgment in this case will have to be reversed on the evidence. The evidence did not show where the liquor was sold. The venue was not proved.,
¶3The judgment below is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.
¶4Petition for a rehearing overruled.